Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Videos
  • PA Reports
  • Submit an article
  • More
    • About JAI
    • Editorial Board
    • Published Ahead of Print (PAP)
  • CAIA Member Login
  • IPR Logo
  • About Us
  • Journals
  • Publish
  • Advertise
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • More
    • Awards
    • Article Licensing
    • Academic Use
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

User menu

  • Sample our Content
  • Request a Demo
  • Log in

Search

  • ADVANCED SEARCH: Discover more content by journal, author or time frame
The Journal of Alternative Investments
  • IPR Logo
  • About Us
  • Journals
  • Publish
  • Advertise
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • More
    • Awards
    • Article Licensing
    • Academic Use
  • Sample our Content
  • Request a Demo
  • Log in
The Journal of Alternative Investments

The Journal of Alternative Investments

ADVANCED SEARCH: Discover more content by journal, author or time frame

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Videos
  • PA Reports
  • Submit an article
  • More
    • About JAI
    • Editorial Board
    • Published Ahead of Print (PAP)
  • CAIA Member Login
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

A Performance Update—Hedge Funds versus Hedged Mutual Funds: An Examination of Equity Long–Short Funds

David F. McCarthy and Brian M. Wong
The Journal of Alternative Investments Fall 2020, jai.2020.1.103; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/jai.2020.1.103
David F. McCarthy
is a principal at D. F. McCarthy LLC in Stockbridge, MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian M. Wong
is an independent investor and consultant in Mamaroneck, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF (Subscribers Only)
Loading

Click to login and read the full article.

Don’t have access? Click here to request a demo 

Alternatively, Call a member of the team to discuss membership options
US and Overseas: +1 646-931-9045
UK: 0207 139 1600

Abstract

This article presents a performance update for the equity long–short mutual funds that were first described and analyzed in McCarthy (2014), extending that analysis to the period from July 2013–December 2019. The analyses confirm that the equity long–short mutual funds provide investment exposure similar to leading equity long–short hedge fund indexes. However, in this later time period, they underperformed the S&P 500 Index and traditional hedge fund indexes. In addition, none of the indexes (i.e., the Index of Equity Long–short Mutual Funds, the HFRI Equity Hedge Fund Index, the DJ-CS L/S Equity Hedge Fund Index, or the CISDM Equity Long–Short Index [as modified]) had positive risk-adjusted returns, as measured by alpha over this later period, and none of the 24 equity long–short mutual funds with full data for the period from July 2013–December 2019 had positive alpha. This article also presents data on the lack of performance persistence across the equity long–short mutual funds, analyzes the considerable change in asset sizes of some of these funds, reports on the closure rate of equity long–short mutual funds over this time period, and notes the positive relationship between excess performance over the S&P 500 Index and equity long–short mutual fund net asset flows. Finally, the appendix broadens the analysis to include equity long–short mutual funds started after July 2013. The performance results from this expanded universe of funds is materially the same as the original sample of mutual funds from 2013.

TOPIC: Mutual fund performance

Key Findings

This article examines equity long-short mutual funds over the period from July 2013–December 2019. It extends an earlier analysis of these same mutual funds through June 2013 (McCarthy 2014) and finds the following:

  • a) Equity long–short mutual funds continue to provide investment exposure similar to equity long–short hedge funds.

  • b) Equity long–short mutual funds have substantially underperformed the S&P 500 Index in absolute return terms over the analysis period (3.4% p.a. vs. 13.7% for the S&P 500). Moreover, as a group, they generated negative alpha over this period (−4.0% p.a.). Further, no individual equity long–short mutual fund included in the analysis earned a positive alpha over this six-and-a-half-year period.

  • c) Equity long–short mutual funds performed similarly to, although slightly behind, leading equity long-short indexes over the analysis period.

  • d) Over the analysis period, no persistence in individual equity long–short mutual fund manager performance was identified. Additionally, as a group and individually, equity long–short mutual funds had difficulties maintaining their asset levels. Only one of the largest five funds in 2013 was still among the five largest at the end of 2019.

The article also includes performance data for equity long–short mutual funds begun after June 2013. The results are largely indistinguishable from the funds begun before that date. That is, this expanded universe of funds also substantially underperformed the S&P 500 Index, as a group did not earn positive alpha, and underperformed leading hedge fund indexes.

  • © 2020 Pageant Media Ltd
View Full Text

Don’t have access? Click here to request a demo

Alternatively, Call a member of the team to discuss membership options

US and Overseas: +1 646-931-9045

UK: 0207 139 1600

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?
Next
Back to top

Explore our content to discover more relevant research

  • By topic
  • Across journals
  • From the experts
  • Monthly highlights
  • Special collections

In this issue

The Journal of Alternative Investments: 23 (3)
The Journal of Alternative Investments
Vol. 23, Issue 3
Winter 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The Journal of Alternative Investments.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Performance Update—Hedge Funds versus Hedged Mutual Funds: An Examination of Equity Long–Short Funds
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The Journal of Alternative Investments
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The Journal of Alternative Investments web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
A Performance Update—Hedge Funds versus Hedged Mutual Funds: An Examination of Equity Long–Short Funds
David F. McCarthy, Brian M. Wong
The Journal of Alternative Investments Jun 2020, jai.2020.1.103; DOI: 10.3905/jai.2020.1.103

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Save To My Folders
Share
A Performance Update—Hedge Funds versus Hedged Mutual Funds: An Examination of Equity Long–Short Funds
David F. McCarthy, Brian M. Wong
The Journal of Alternative Investments Jun 2020, jai.2020.1.103; DOI: 10.3905/jai.2020.1.103
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Tweet Widget Facebook Like LinkedIn logo

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • BRIEF REVIEW OF MCCARTHY (2014)
    • COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE OF EQUITY LONG–SHORT MUTUAL FUNDS: JULY 2013–DECEMBER 2019
    • PERFORMANCE OF EQUITY LONG–SHORT MUTUAL FUNDS: DATA SEGMENTATION
    • PERFORMANCE OF EQUITY LONG–SHORT MUTUAL FUNDS: PERSISTENCE
    • COMPARATIVE PROFILE OF EQUITY LONG–SHORT MUTUAL FUNDS
    • PERFORMANCE AND FUND FLOWS
    • CONCLUSION
    • ADDITIONAL READING
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • APPENDIX
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF (Subscribers Only)
  • PDF (Subscribers Only)

Similar Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar
LONDON
One London Wall, London, EC2Y 5EA
United Kingdom
+44 207 13 1600
 
NEW YORK
41 Madison Avenue, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10010
USA
+1 646 931 9045
pm-research@pageantmedia.com
 

Stay Connected

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

MORE FROM PMR

  • Home
  • Awards
  • Investment Guides
  • Videos
  • About PMR

INFORMATION FOR

  • Academics
  • Agents
  • Authors
  • Content Usage Terms

GET INVOLVED

  • Advertise
  • Publish
  • Article Licensing
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe Now
  • Log In
  • Update your profile
  • Give us your feedback

© 2021 Pageant Media Ltd | All Rights Reserved | ISSN: 1520-3255 | E-ISSN: 2168-8435

  • Site Map
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies