PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Andr Frei AU - Michael Studer TI - Practitioner's Guide to Private Equity Benchmarking AID - 10.3905/jai.2004.461460 DP - 2004 Dec 31 TA - The Journal of Alternative Investments PG - 81--94 VI - 7 IP - 3 4099 - https://pm-research.com/content/7/3/81.short 4100 - https://pm-research.com/content/7/3/81.full AB - Benchmarking private equity investments with public market benchmarks is difficult because of the specific characteristics of private equity. In this article, various benchmarking methods that aim to draw the practitioners' attention to the subtleties of comparing private equity performance with public markets are discussed. The authors elaborate that the requirement of a specific robustness criterion reduces the number of suitable benchmarking methodologies. They conclude that the static spread method (widely used for fixed income investments, but generally unknown in the context of private equity investments) represents the most meaningful methodology. Benchmarking historical private equity data with the static spread method reveals that private equity outperformed public equity markets by around 5%.