TY - JOUR T1 - Defending the “Endowment Model”: <em>Quantifying</em> <br/> <em>Liquidity Risk in a Post–Credit Crisis World</em> JF - The Journal of Alternative Investments SP - 9 LP - 24 DO - 10.3905/jai.2012.14.4.009 VL - 14 IS - 4 AU - Abdullah Z. Sheikh AU - Jianxiong Sun Y1 - 2012/03/31 UR - https://pm-research.com/content/14/4/9.abstract N2 - This article sets forth the proposition that liquidity risk may be optimized in an attempt to forestall or minimize the impact of a liquidity crisis. For a generic (but typical) endowment asset allocation, the authors find that liquidity levels between 6% and 14% are optimal, all other things equal, because 95% of the time, an allocation in this range would obviate situations in which a portfolio’s payout rate exceeds its liquidity pool. The framework also provides insights for tail-risk events involving a particularly severe liquidity crisis. For a generic endowment portfolio, the analysis indicates that in order to reduce the severity of a liquidity crisis to zero (i.e., eliminate risk completely), the allocation to fixed income would have to be around 35% (close to seven times the payout rate of 5%). Such an allocation would entail a very significant opportunity cost in terms of forgone returns based solely on a desire to mitigate extreme liquidity events (the proverbial “100-year flood”). In the authors’ view, reducing the likelihood of a liquidity crisis to below 5%, may be undesirable for all but the most risk-averse and least returnsensitive endowments.TOPICS: Foundations &amp; endowments, real assets/alternative investments/private equity, risk management, portfolio construction ER -